The Most Expensive Word in Yachting is “Fair”
- Captn Tommy

- Jan 1
- 8 min read
Updated: Jan 13
Why the shift from vibe-based to evidence-based reporting is quietly reshaping the used boat market

If you are shopping for a cruising boat in 2026, it can feel like the rules changed mid-season.
You find the right boat. The layout works. The sea trial is good. The owner is credible. The boat is not new, but it is honest.
Then the deal runs into the modern gate: insurance.
That is the moment many buyers realize a hard truth about today’s market. You are not only buying fiberglass and stainless. You are buying an underwriting profile.
Condition still matters, obviously. But what can be proven, documented, and clearly communicated now plays a much larger role in whether a boat is easy to insure, easy to finance, easy to berth, and ultimately easy to sell.
And one small detail sits at the center of it: language.
In the old world, a survey might say, “The rigging appears fair for its age.” In the new world, “fair” often reads like “unknown remaining life.” To an underwriting desk, “unknown” is not a vibe. It is a risk flag.
This is why the most expensive word in yachting is “fair.” Not because it is dishonest, but because it is vague.
1) The death of the vibe-based survey
For decades, survey language tolerated a lot of gray. Not deception, just softness.
Words like “fair,” “serviceable,” and “appears acceptable” worked as shorthand between experienced humans. Buyers read between the lines, negotiated, and planned upgrades over time.
But that style was built for a world where the survey was mainly a buyer tool.
In 2026, the survey is increasingly also an underwriting document. Many insurers require a marine survey for used boats above certain age, length, or value thresholds before they will write coverage.
In today’s market, insurance decisions are no longer automatic. While buyers still deal with an insurance company, the actual decision is made by the underwriter — the person or team assessing the risk behind the scenes.
That changes how words land.
An underwriter does not see a “loved boat.” They see a risk profile and a set of unknowns.
They want to know:
What is verified?
What is unknown?
What is safety-critical?
What is the remediation path and timeframe?
Vibe-based wording often fails that test, even when the boat is fundamentally sound.
This is why “fair” can be financially lethal. It compresses too many realities into one adjective. It might mean “not perfect,” or “typical for age,” or “needs attention soon,” or “likely end-of-life.” Underwriters do not guess which meaning you intended. They default to the worst plausible interpretation, then impose conditions or decline.
The boat did not change. The interpretation environment did.
2) The standardization of safety: the code becomes the referee
Here is the nuance that makes this shift unassailable for professionals: the “blame” is not on surveyors, it is on standardization.
Modern surveys are not supposed to be poetry. They are supposed to be a defensible technical record. Many surveyors explicitly reference voluntary standards such as ABYC, NFPA, or ISO as part of how they evaluate systems and frame findings.
ABYC itself describes its standards as an authoritative reference for evaluating design, construction, maintenance, and product performance, and it urges boat owners to use a surveyor who is connected to that standards ecosystem.
This matters because standards do two powerful things:
They turn “opinion” into “comparison.”Instead of “this is fair,” the surveyor can say, “this installation does not meet commonly accepted safety practice,” and cite a standard or a known compliance benchmark.
They remove emotion from the transaction. Underwriters do not want the surveyor to be a villain. They want the surveyor to be a translator. Standards give the surveyor a neutral foundation for doing that.
In short, the market is not demanding softer reports. It is demanding reports that are easier to underwrite, and standards are part of how that happens.
3) The great decoupling: one fleet, two value systems
The used boat market is increasingly splitting into two different asset behaviors.
The “Gold File” boats, or Digital Equity
These are not just “well kept” boats. They are boats with a chain of evidence:
invoices with dates and scope,
professional sign-offs where relevant,
documented rigging age,
service records for engines, saildrives, steering,
through-hull and seacock replacement records,
safety gear certificates and dates,
and a simple maintenance log that is coherent and complete.
In 2026, this is not paperwork, it is Digital Equity.
A missing log, missing receipts, or unknown ages are not neutral anymore. They behave like a discount mechanism because they create underwriting uncertainty. The boat might be fine, but the file is not.
That is the decoupling. Seaworthiness is physical. Liquidity is documentary.
The discounted boats
Then there are boats that may be physically sound but “thin on paper.”
Owner-performed work can be excellent. The problem is not DIY. The problem is that insurers and financiers cannot underwrite confidence from “trust me.” They underwrite what can be verified.
So the buyer has to budget not just for maintenance, but for proof. And proof often becomes a forced timeline, not a slow-burn upgrade plan.
This is how the “perfectly good yacht” becomes the most expensive boat on the market, not because it costs the most to buy, but because it costs the most to make insurable with confidence.
If you want an easy win in the 2026 market, start building the underwriting file before you book a survey. Our model-specific Survey-Prep Guides include the exact owner questions and photo checklist that reduce ‘unknowns’ early. TrueNorth Yacht Advisors
4) The liability wall: why “just self-insure” often fails in practice
When buyers get frustrated, the next thought is predictable:
“Why not skip hull coverage and self-insure the boat?”
Sometimes you can choose to self-insure hull risk. Liability is different.
Many marinas and facilities require proof of liability insurance before offering slips or services, and some insurance providers explicitly note that abbreviated surveys are often rejected because underwriters need detail.
Even when a facility is flexible, liability is not just a rule, it is personal risk containment. A 44-foot boat can do real damage, and liability policies exist for a reason.
The catch is that insurers may still require an insurance survey to write that liability policy, especially for older boats and higher-risk profiles.
So the modern pain point is often not “liability is expensive.” The pain point is “liability requires proof, and proof costs money.”
Survey costs are commonly quoted in the $20 to $25 per foot range as a working rule of thumb, depending on scope and region.
5) The surveyor as risk translator, and why precision sells boats
Surveyors have not become kingmakers, but their reports have become more consequential because they sit between the boat and the underwriting desk.
In this environment, a good survey report is not softer. It is sharper.
Not fewer findings, but clearer findings.
A vague report creates uncertainty. Uncertainty triggers conditions, exclusions, or declines.
A precise report gives an underwriter a reason to say “yes,” even if that yes comes with a structured to-do list.
Here is the difference:
Vibe-based: “Engine seems okay.
”Evidence-based: “Engine started from cold, reached operating temperature normally, no abnormal smoke observed during sea trial, no active leaks observed at time of inspection. Service records show heat exchanger service in 2024.”
That is not a “clean bill of health.” It is a reduction of unknowns.
And this is the nuance many buyers miss: a report with findings is not a failure.
In 2026, underwriters expect findings. On a 2010 boat, a report that lists nothing meaningful can raise practical questions, at minimum because it does not provide the underwriting detail required to close risk items. A credible survey often includes a list of recommendations, and what matters is that the list is categorized by severity and paired with a reasonable remediation plan.
6) Buyer action block: the Surveyor Brief
If you are buying in today’s market, do not hire a surveyor and hope the report lands well.
Brief them. Not to soften anything, but to produce a report that is underwriter-usable.
State the goal. “I need a report suitable for insurance underwriting, with clear safety-critical vs service items.”
Provide evidence upfront. Send the logbook, invoices, and dates before the inspection so the surveyor can cite them.
Request actionable definitives.
Ask the surveyor to separate:
observed facts,
owner-reported claims,
items not tested or not accessible.
Expect conditions, and plan for them. A good report often includes a remediation list. The goal is not perfection, it is a clear path to binding coverage.
7) Seller action block: pre-market audit your Digital Equity
If you are selling in 2026, you are not just detailing the interior.
You are preparing an underwriting-ready file.
A simple “Gold File” folder should include:
a one-page system health summary (rigging date, through-hulls date, engine services, batteries, safety gear),
invoices for big-ticket work,
photos of key installations and serial plates,
and a short known-issues list.
Two common traps:
Rigging age ambiguity: Unknown age is priced as old. Do not argue, document or price accordingly.
Paperwork mismatches: HIN, registration, VAT, and titles must align cleanly.
Bottom line: the transparency economy has arrived
The handshake deal is fading, not because people became dishonest, but because the transaction is now gated by institutions that underwrite risk, not stories.
Your job as a buyer is to reduce unknowns before they become conditions.
Your job as a seller is to stop losing value through missing proof.
And your job as a surveyor, whether you like it or not, is increasingly to translate reality into underwriting language anchored in recognized standards.
Because in 2026, “fair” is not a comfort word. It is a discount word.
In 2026, the buyer who wins is the buyer who shows up with proof. If you’re shortlisting a specific yacht model, start with a TrueNorth Survey-Prep Guide. It’s designed to help you ask the right questions, collect the right photos, and spot the known failure points before you commit to a surveyor, travel, or negotiation.
What to Do Next (Before You Book a Survey)
If this article made you pause, that’s a good thing.
The biggest mistake buyers make in today’s market isn’t choosing the wrong boat. It’s spending time and money on a boat that was never insurable in the first place.
Before you:
book a survey
pay for a haul-out
travel to view a yacht
emotionally commit to a listing
You need to know whether the boat can pass the underwriting reality check.
Insurance Readiness Pack
We created a short, practical toolkit to help buyers and sellers navigate this new reality.
Insurance Readiness Pack shows you:
what underwriters actually look for (documents, dates, proof)
which words and gaps quietly trigger insurance declines
how to request the right photos and records from a seller
how to filter boats early, before costs stack up
how to present a clean, survey-ready file when you do proceed
It’s designed to be used before surveys, travel, or negotiations begin.
Start with the Insurance Readiness Pack (USD 9) to understand what insurers actually require and gather the minimum proof before you waste time or money.
Next, use the Model-Specific Survey-Prep Guide (USD 29) to collect the right photos, videos, and maintenance evidence for that exact yacht.
Insurance-Ready Boat File (USD 29) gives you a survey-style documentation system, with logs and strict dated evidence rules, so your boat’s condition is easy for underwriters to verify.
Finally, if you want a professional second set of eyes before committing, add Remote Pre-Survey Buyer Support (USD 149)



